logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.12.10 2013고단4094
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등협박)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 2012, the Defendant is a person who is legally in marital relationship with the victim B (the age of 46) (the age of 46).

On June 22, 2012, around 22:00, the Defendant expressed the attitude that the Defendant would inflict any harm on the body of the victim, while disputing the difference between the victim and the religion, and that the Defendant threatened the victim by showing the attitude that the Defendant would inflict any harm on the body of the victim.

2. On August 8, 2013, the Defendant, at around 06:00 on August 8, 2012, the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collectively, deadly weapons, etc.) (collectively, deadly weapons, etc.) committed the assault of the Defendant at the above location around 06:0 on August 8, 2012, 200, the Defendant, who was in his/her hand at his/her hand, caused the assault of the Defendant, thereby causing danger to the victim of the escape between the

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Application of each photographic Act and subordinate statutes attached to the investigation report;

1. Articles 3 (2) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., the fact that the injured party who is the wife of the accused does not want the punishment of the accused, the accused does not have any particular criminal record and is against the mistake);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the above regular consideration) is above;

arrow