The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of one and a half years of imprisonment sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the judgment, although it is recognized that the defendant made a confession and reflect on the criminal facts when he was in the trial, and that he did not repeat the crime, the defendant has already been punished several times for the same crime, and the defendant committed again the crime of this case during the repeated crime period even though he had been sentenced three times, although he was sentenced to a punishment, he again committed the crime of this case during the repeated crime period, and the defendant purchased the Meptist from F and was sentenced to an excessive punishment compared to others, the court below seems to have determined the sentence by taking into account all the circumstances such as the defendant's criminal records and criminal records, interval between the defendant's criminal records and the amount of the defendant's purchase, etc. According to F's statement, according to the F's statement, the defendant appears to have expressed his intention to purchase the Mepter, and the amount of the Meptist's purchased by the defendant is not 0.7gg, and there is no other evidence that the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and result of the crime, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.