A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 11:03 on February 26, 2013, the Defendant insultd the victim C (Nam, 60 years of age) who worked in the company B with the Defendant, among several taxi officers, at the taxi platform in 370-1 KTX-1, the Defendant: (a) 11:03, the Defendant laid off this son, (b) 200, in a way that the Defendant was able to see why she would have scam a remote brue; (c) she she scrut this scrut; (d) she she scruted the victim, (e) she scruted in this brut; (e) she laid off this scrut; (e) 20,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000).

2. Around 07:00 on December 27, 2012, the Defendant assaulted the victim by means of cutting the son and son’s body used by the victim on the grounds that the victim resists the Defendant’s her bath, satisfing the body, satfing the body of the victim, satching the victim’s satfage, sating the victim’s sat, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement C and each police statement of D;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning recording records, CDs, photographs, and content of civil petition filing;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the Defendant had a record of being subject to criminal punishment several times due to the same crime, and in particular, even though having been sentenced to a fine in 2012 due to the victim’s bodily injury, the Defendant again committed each of the instant crimes against the victim.