This case shall not be under the jurisdiction of the court.

1. On March 25, 2009, the person against whom the request for attachment order was made, was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny at the Seoul Eastern District Court for a period of eight months, and on December 2, 2010, the Seoul High Court sentenced three years and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for robbery, injury, etc. at Seoul High Court on January 24, 201, which became final and conclusive on January 24, 201, and the execution of the said sentence was completed on July 17, 2014.

【The Defendant: (a) around 18:32 on March 20, 2019, at the main point operated by the Victim C (V, 55 years of age) located in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu; (b) on the part of his customer, the Defendant: (c) opened the customer, and her beer with the victim; (d) opened the victim with the beer; and (e) caused the victim to lose his mind by leaving the strokem of psychotropic drugs, which were prescribed by the victim under the pretext of constant strophy treatment; and (e) caused the victim to sleep the strokem of the strokem, which was in possession of the strokem for the victim’s alcohol; and (e) caused the victim to lose his mind, around 22:42 on the same day, around 150,00 won of cash owned by the victim, resident registration certificates, and main keys, etc.; (e) opened the 190,000 won of the market price.

As a result, the Defendant took the victim's property by means of assault using psychotropic drugs, and caused the victim to be injured by such means as leaving the victim in a state of temporary unknown consciousness.

【The necessity of the attachment order requester】 It is revealed that the Defendant was sentenced by the Seoul High Court on December 2, 2010 to three years and six months in prison due to robbery, injury, etc. on July 17, 2014, and committed the robbery in this case within ten years after the execution of the sentence was completed, and the same veterinary act was repeated; the offense was significant, its attitude, and the violence and cruel nature of the person who requested the attachment order were revealed; and the risk of recidivism in the evaluation of adult recidivism risk assessment devices (KSORAS-G).