A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the number of crimes Nos. 15, 23, 41, 48, 75, and 80 of the crime sight table were rewritten.

Punishment of the crime

In a case where the defendant has very low resistance to a disease or continued administration, treatment, etc. of drugs to the extent that he is unable to cope with pain treatment, he/she has no state of continuous observation by medical personnel, such as side effects or nutritional conditions of the administered drugs, management of food and drinks, etc., and thus he/she has no need for long-term hospitalization, and thus, he/she has hospitalized more excessively than the necessary number of days and received a written confirmation of hospitalization to claim insurance money to each insurance company of the victimized person, and on January 16, 2008, he/she has received a written confirmation of hospitalization, and other conical obstacle "the same year".

2. After being hospitalized by 25 days until February 23, 201, the Defendant received KRW 2,570,000 as insurance money from the said Hyundai Dlop Bio-resources Co., Ltd. on the 27th of the same month, and then received KRW 2,570,00 from the said Hyundai Dlop Bio-resources Co., Ltd. on February 17, 2016, as shown in the separate crime list (except for KRW 15,23,41, 48, 75, and 80 each time) and received KRW 301,962,741 as insurance money from each insurance company that suffered damage by filing a claim for insurance money.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A criminal investigation report (attaching the result of a reply to the deep level analysis);

1. Details of analysis of medical records A;

1. In full view of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the foregoing evidence, even if considering the fact that the defendant had some symptoms and had undergone an operation on the ground of the symptoms, the defendant is guilty of the charges of this case that he received insurance money from each damaged insurance company after being hospitalized more excessively than the necessary number of days without the necessity of long-term hospitalization, despite the absence of a need for long-term hospitalization.

(1) The defendant is insured with the same content from 208 to 2015.