logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 장흥지원 2012.09.20 2012고정25
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

D purchased a 31,772m2 from the Defendant on the said land, who was operating a new fish farming business on the said land, filed a lawsuit for delivery of the said C land to the head of the Gwangju District Court (No. 2009Gadan1888), and the Defendant was adopted as a witness of the said case, and took an oath around March 14:30, 201, at the court of the Gwangju District Court head of the Seoul District Court, located in the area of No. 88 of the Namdong-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (No. 2009Gadan1888).

In relation to the current status of the land in which Defendant E’s attorney F was newly operated, the Defendant testified to the Defendant that “A witness did not sell G land to the Defendant around 1995 and received KRW 41 million in the purchase price,” and that “A witness did not receive KRW 41 million in the purchase price at once and received KRW 41 million in the purchase price.” In addition, the Defendant testified to the effect that he was not designated as G land.”

However, in fact, the Defendant’s designation and sale of the said G land to the above E, and received the payment of the purchase price with respect to the said G land from E, but did not designate “G land” and presented false statements contrary to memory.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of witness E;

1. Protocol of pleadings;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on receipts, real estate sales contracts;

1. Relevant Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. On January 28, 199, the Defendant entered into a land sales contract with E on January 28, 199, without specifying G, and entered into a contract with E on June 200, the Defendant made a verbal setting of a lot number as G, and the receipt for KRW 17 million was modified.

Therefore, the defendant is a lawyer.

arrow