The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

1. The reasoning of the lower court’s acceptance of the first instance judgment is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for modification or addition as follows. Thus, this Court’s acceptance by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The 10th day of the second 10th day of the judgment of the first instance shall be amended to "A. 1, 2000" as "A. 1, 200."

The term "member" in Article 5 (1) of the Articles of Incorporation amended on April 30, 2005 shall be amended to "member".

In addition, Article 6(3) of the Revised Articles of Incorporation of April 30, 2005, the third party of the first instance judgment and the third party of the Revised Articles of Incorporation of April 30, 2005, “If there are two or more successors, one representative shall be selected and applied by one person: Provided, That if the representative is unable to be selected, another inheritor’

Article 7 of the Addenda to the Amended Articles of Incorporation of July 13, 2013, the third party of the judgment of the first instance, shall be amended to "one of the first donor or the lineal family members of the second party who actively participated in the relocation of a cemetery in the relocation of a cemetery and contributed significantly to the creation of assets of the Bridges shall be qualified as associate members at this time."

The 6th 2 and 3th 2nd 6th 2 and 3th 1th 3th 1st "A evidence 5th 1 to 14th 5th 11th 1st 2nd."

Following the 6th five of the first instance judgment “no evidence exists” (as of January 1, 200, the Defendant, as of January 1, 2000, agreed to grant the status of associate members in the case of full-time residents residing in C in the Namyang City as of January 1, 200, and the full-time members move to another region from around 2005, and then, around 2010, the Defendant, through the resolution of the board of directors and the general assembly, participated in the relocation of the Wol cemetery and contributed to the formation of the Defendant’s property, provided that the 69 persons listed in the list of this case (excluding the remaining four persons deleted from the list) who are not eligible as regular members or one of his/her lineal family members, shall be granted the status of associate members (Article 7 of the Addenda amended on July 13, 2013).

However, the Plaintiff’s father (the father D is not included in the above 69 persons).