1. On June 7, 2017, based on the executory exemplification of the judgment of Gwangju District Court 2013Gahap555 with respect to C.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, the plaintiff purchased movable property listed in the separate sheet around July 2015, and the defendant can find the fact that he/she commenced compulsory execution on June 7, 2017, based on the executory exemplification of the judgment of the Gwangju District Court 2013Gahap555 with respect to movable property listed in the separate sheet, including seizure of movable property listed in the separate sheet under the Jeonju District Court 2017Mo199.

According to the above facts of recognition, the plaintiff, as the owner of movable property listed in the attached list, may claim the ownership of the defendant who seized movable property listed in the attached list and seek the exclusion of enforcement thereof. Thus, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted for reasons.