The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is against the defendant's recognition of the crime of this case, and the damage caused by the crime of this case seems to have been returned to the victim, etc. However, even though the defendant committed the crime of this case, the crime of this case, such as destruction of the entrance of the cell phone store and intrusion on the store and theft of the cell phone even during the repeated period, is of significant nature, and the damage amount caused by the crime of this case is reasonable, and the damage amount caused by the crime of this case is not agreed with the victim, and other circumstances that form the conditions for the sentencing of this case, such as the defendant's age, character, character, environment, family relationship, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable, and thus, the defendant and his

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.