Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

Joint Defendant C did not appear on August 23, 2017, which was the date of the instant judgment judgment, and sentenced only Defendant A and B to a judgment.

The following was written only for the crimes against Defendant A and B.

Defendant

A, B, and co-defendant C are foreigners of the nationality of the People's Republic of China who are engaged in steel-replace work at the construction site of the D Apartment in Chungcheong City.

1. The Defendants who jointly commit the crime of interference with the Defendants’ business are found to be under the influence of alcohol in collusion with the co-defendant C on July 7, 2016, namely, “F in Chungcheong City E” on July 21, 2016.

The victim G, who is an employee, has failed to perform his/her behavior such as provoking, sound, and drinking a vision to other customers. The victim G, who is an employee, did not perform his/her alcohol with the thickness of the President.

“On the ground that it was said that the said restaurant business was interfered with by force for about 15 minutes, such as having a customer who was involved in the disturbance go home, and having the customer who was involved in the disturbance go home, as a boomed to the breath’s hand, and throw the boomed down.

2. Defendant A and Co-Defendant C, who committed a crime interfering with the performance of official duties of Defendant A around 22:00 on July 7, 2016, at around 112 on the street in front of the restaurant as described in the above paragraph (1) above, prevented the disturbance of Defendant A and Co-Defendant C by the police officer I and J, J, J, J, K, and Lman on the Hoju Police Station, called Defendant A and Co-Defendant C, and the Co-Defendant C, said Co-Defendant C, “The police officer of Korea would be so doing so so, and the circumstances leading up to the occurrence of the damage I (41 years of age).”

As a result, Defendant A committed assault, such as flabing the 112 report processing duties by a police officer and destroying the flab, cutting the flab on the floor by pushing the flabing the flab of the victim, Defendant A pushed the victim beyond his joint flab, and continuously arrested the victim C, and the victim was arrested the joint flab, thereby obstructing Defendant C in collusion with the joint flab in performing the legitimate duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender.

Summary of Evidence

1..