logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.04.20 2017고정146
도로교통법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Any driver of a motor vehicle shall observe signals and instructions conveyed by traffic safety facilities.

Nevertheless, at around 13:52 on July 30, 2016, the Defendant violated the signal system installed in the front bank while driving the eropo-type vehicle B at the intersection in the central market via the intersection in the middle of the city of the Busan-gu, Busan-gu., the Defendant, even though the signal of the signal apparatus installed in the front bank was red signal.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Testing performance records and video control materials;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as filing an objection and filing materials for rectification;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 156 subparagraph 1 and 5 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant guilty of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order: (a) acknowledged the Defendant’s mistake; (b) in the court, he entered the intersection without stopping the “sule signal”; and (c) did not enter the intersection “sule signal”.

Since this is administered, we examine this.

According to Article 4 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 6 (2) and 6 (2) and (2) of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act (attached Table 2), the yellow signal, such as vehicle signal, means that “motor vehicles and horses shall immediately stop immediately before or after a stop line exists or crosswalks, and shall promptly pass out of the intersection if a part of the horse at the intersection is already entered.”

Therefore, it is obvious that the defendant's entry to the intersection without stopping in yellow signals is clear that the signal violation is committed, and the latter part of the above phrase is about the case where the yellow signal is changed after entering the intersection, etc. to the intersection, and therefore, this case does not apply to this case where it is evident that the defendant did not enter the intersection in the proceeding, as well.

B. According to the supporting materials, etc. submitted by the Defendant, the Defendant’s vehicle is at the time of the lapse of 0.6 seconds after the yellow signal was changed to a red signal.

arrow