1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: the "this court" in the 4th and 15th of the judgment of the court of first instance is "court of first instance"; the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the

2. The additional part of the Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff’s disposition of this case is lawful, since the Plaintiff’s work cannot be formed on the forest land of this case, even if the Defendant accepted the report of this case.

In full view of the structure, form, text, etc. of Article 15(1), (3), and Article 15-2(2)2 and (3) of the Mountainous Districts Management Act, and Article 18-3(4) [Attachment Table 3-3] subparagraph 4(b) of the Enforcement Decree of the Mountainous Districts Management Act, where a person intending to temporarily use a mountainous district uses mountainous district for a given period under the condition that he/she restores it to a mountainous district in order to create an area which is not a restricted area for conversion or temporary use of a mountainous district within three meters in width, or makes a report on temporary use of mountainous district to change the form and quality of the mountainous district for such purpose, the head of the Gun, etc. who is not a person who makes a false report or makes a report by other unlawful means, shall accept