logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.11.12 2013고정1031
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. At around 20:00 on November 3, 2012, the Defendant: (a) published a false statement on the bulletin board of the F and G website of an incorporated association, “The president of H organization was sentenced to conviction as a crime of assault against female employees in one’s office and sexual intercourse; and (b) on the grounds that the victim D’s submission of a petition seeking his/her disciplinary action to the E Association was made by the victim D, and that only only members of the E Association were aware of his/her detention.” (c) as the title “written reply to the petition submitted by the president of H organization to the E Association, a statement disclosing the violation of the provisions on handover and takeover; and (d) was sentenced to conviction as a crime of assault against female employees in one’s office and sexual intercourse. Masan’s five million won that was provided as a condition that he/she lives in the World War in 200

Accordingly, the Defendant, through the information and communication network, revealed public false information, thereby impairing the honor of the victim D.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 70(3) of the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, and the instant facts charged cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 70(3) of the same Act. After the institution of the instant indictment,

arrow