(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.02.23 2016가단103064

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.02.23 2016가단103064

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's assertion

A. On June 21, 2009, the Plaintiff: (a) heard on June 21, 2009, the Plaintiff: (b) held that one of the instant LAC LAD, which leases it to the private sector, would be able to carry out the event (hereinafter “instant event project”; and (c) deposited KRW 20 million in total with C’s account; (d) 22 days following the following day, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 20 million in the instant event E account.

B. After being introduced by C as a person who actually promotes the instant event project, the Defendant: “The Defendant, the representative director of the Dispute Resolution D, will be in accordance with the business rights through the royalties, and the amount of KRW 20 million,00,000,000 already received through C, out of the amount of KRW 100,000,000,000,000, which is the remainder of KRW 80,000,000,000,000,000,000, to the Defendant from July 1, 2009 to October 7, 2009.”

C. However, even if the Defendant received the money from the Plaintiff from the beginning, the fact was that the Defendant, as if he were fluencing the F with a pro rata to F without an intention to pay the money, could be able to comply with the instant event project right, by deceiving the Plaintiff, received KRW 70 million from the Plaintiff for the purpose of flucing funds. D.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff 70 million won and damages for delay due to the tort.

2. Determination

A. The Plaintiff transferred KRW 20 million to C on June 22, 2009, and KRW 50 million in total to the Defendant from July 1, 2009 to October 7, 2009, with respect to the instant event project. 2) In relation to the evidence of breach of trust against the Defendant, the suspicion of fraud, the suspicion of breach of trust against F, and the suspicion of breach of trust against the Plaintiff and C, the internal investigation agency had conducted the internal investigation agency on December 28, 2010, at the permanent branch office of the Daegu District Public Prosecutor’s Office, the Plaintiff made a non-prosecution decision against the Plaintiff, the Defendant, F, and A on December 28, 2010, and summary of the main contents thereof.

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 2013.10.11 2013고단2067

-수원지방법원 2019.04.10 2018나51553

-의정부지방법원 2017.07.14 2016가단29500

-수원지방법원성남지원 2014.10.21 2014가단20232

-서울남부지방법원 2016.10.27 2014가합112096