1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of disposition;

A. At around 10:50 on February 13, 2009, the deceased B (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) performed an operation for medical treatment after receiving injury, such as knife, knife, knife, knife, and knife, from the film plant at the above company’s film plant (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”), while working for the production worker of the Korea Twitch Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Switch”), the deceased B performed the operation for medical treatment after receiving injury, such as the injury (hereinafter referred to as “the injury”), knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, etc. of two balance.

B. On January 9, 2010, the Deceased had been diagnosed as “constituous disorder” during the medical treatment, and on January 19, 2010, the Deceased filed an application for additional injury to the Defendant claiming that “the divesivesive disorder occurred due to the finger-out accident,” but the Defendant, on April 13, 2010, filed an application for additional injury to the Defendant on the ground that “it is difficult to confirm the causal relationship between the already approved medical branch and the existing approval because the divesive disorder occurred due to an individual or internal factor.”

C. Around September 2010, the Deceased who closed the medical treatment of the injury or disease with the approval of the weather was killed on March 21, 2014 and was living on the rooftop of a female apartment at around 11:30 on March 21, 201.

On August 2015, the Plaintiff, who is the father of the Deceased, filed an application for the payment of bereaved family benefits and funeral expenses with the Defendant on the ground that “the death of the Deceased was caused by the instant accident that was cut off, and caused suicide due to mental division, and thus, the death of the Deceased constitutes occupational accident.” However, on October 13, 2015, the Defendant is presumed to have committed suicide by the deceased’s private person as of October 13, 2015, and is presumed to have a personal vulnerability related to the deceased’s suicide (i.e., the spin-off disorder, the depression disorder), and (ii) suicide and the injury and the injury and injury and injury and injury and injury.