The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year of imprisonment, three years of suspended sentence, three years of probation, observation of protection, and one hundred and sixty hours of community service) is too unreasonable.

2. The decision-making defendant shows an attitude against the victim when he/she was aware of his/her mistake, and agreed with the victims.

However, each of the crimes of this case was committed by the defendant by threatening the victims to report the violation of environmental laws and regulations to the media or to file a civil petition to the competent authorities, and it was not committed in light of the contents and results of the crime.

In addition, even though the defendant was subject to criminal punishment several times due to the crimes of the same law, there is a high possibility of criticism by putting the crimes of this case again.

Considering the circumstances unfavorable or favorable to the defendant as above, the circumstances after the crime, the age of the defendant, sexual conduct, environment, and all other factors of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, the punishment imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable, and therefore, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.