logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.11 2017고단8261
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On November 3, 2005, the Defendant: (a) his employee violated the Defendant’s duties in violation of the restriction on the operation of the vehicle of the Road Management Agency by operating the said truck in a state where it is loaded with freight of 1.17 soil over 10 tons of the limitation 10 tons on the said truck at the business office of the Cheongdo-dong, Seoul, a Cheongdo-dong, a Cheongdo-dong, Cheongdo-dong, Cheongdo-dong, in a direction-setting 6.5km-ro, an outer-ro, Seoul.5km-dong.

2. Article 2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 832, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 2014, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 2014, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 2013, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 2487, Oct. 22, 2005; Act No. 20144, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 2020, Jan. 5, 2005; Act No. 20148, Feb. 28, 201).

Thus, the facts charged of this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow