Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On December 26, 2013, the Defendant driven B rocketing taxi on December 02 and 2013, and continued three lanes from the four-lanes of the road in front of the arche apartment apartment in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, to the 40km long from the chilling area to the chilling area.

At the time, since it is an intersection where a signal is installed at night and at that time, in such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the signals by reducing the speed and checking well the front left.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not see that the vehicle driving signal is changed to a stop signal, and the Defendant was negligent in proceeding along as is, from the left side of the Defendant’s running direction, the front part of the victim C(32 years old) driving on the right side of the said car, and received the front part of the said car from the victim C(32 years old) driving on the right side of the instant taxi.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim C to suffer the injury of the victim E (the age of 31) who was accompanied by the victim E (the age of 31) with approximately 12 weeks of treatment, which requires the victim C to receive approximately 2 weeks of treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (2) and a traffic accident occurrence report;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of imprisonment without prison labor;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) (see the reasons for sentencing) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant suffered serious injury from one of the victims due to gross negligence of violating signal signal, but it seems that there is no particular problem about the victims' recovery from damage because the taxi involved in the accident was admitted to the mutual aid association.