1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. 기초사실 갑 제1, 3호증의 각 기재에 의하면, 원고는 액면금 1,000만 원, 지불기일 2003. 7. 25., 발행일 1999. 11. 25., 발행인 피고로 된 약속어음(갑 제1호증, 이하 ‘이 사건 약속어음’이라고 한다)을 소지하고 있는 사실, 그런데 당초 위 약속어음의 지불기일란에 2000. 7. 22., 발행일란에 1999. 11. 22.로 기재되어 있다가 ‘2000’ 부분 중간에 줄이 그어지고 그 윗부분에 ‘2003’이라고 기재되었고, 각 ‘22’ 중 뒷자리 ‘2’부분이 ‘5’로 변경되었으며, 변경된 각 ‘25’ 옆에 ‘(오)’라고 기재되어 있는 사실, 피고가 원고에게 2013. 6. 9. ‘답변을 안주시면 내용증명 보낸대로 차용한 천만원 드리고 내일부터 저가 장사를 하겠습니다’라는, 2013. 6. 10. ‘돈준비했으니 언제 자리를 비워 줄껀지 답변 주세요’라는 각 문자메시지를 보낸 사실이 인정된다.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) Around November 22, 1999, the plaintiff loaned the payment period of KRW 10 million to the defendant on July 22, 2000 and received the Promissory Notes of this case, the payment period of which is the above payment period. Upon the defendant's request for the postponement of payment period, the payment period of the said Promissory Notes was corrected to " July 25, 2003." Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay the loan of KRW 10 million to the plaintiff and the delay damages for the above amount. 2) Accordingly, the defendant's assertion from around November 1995 to Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan City D D Distribution was "the street store of this case."

Around 196, the Plaintiff’s partner E and the Plaintiff’s partner entered into a partnership agreement with the Defendant to provide the instant street store and divide sales profits into one half each while operating E and then to divide sales profits. As E embezzled sales profits, E reversed the above partnership agreement around 1999.

However, at the request of the plaintiff, the plaintiff is again on November 22, 1999.