Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that it does not harm the identity of the facts charged and the defendant's right to defense, part of the facts charged was revised and stated in accordance with evidence.

Any person who intends to conduct a motor vehicle management business shall register with the head of a Si/Gun/Gu as prescribed by Ordinance of Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.

Nevertheless, on August 20, 2018, the Defendant, without registering the automobile maintenance business, was equipped with various tools, etc. necessary for the automobile maintenance on the roads of the new IC bank in the Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Seoyang-si, Incheon Metropolitan City, which was located on the roads of the new IC, and carried out capture work to check the condition of the vehicle near the rear wheels of the CNAS car.

In this respect, the Defendant carried out unregistered automobile management business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Investigation reports (to hear statements from other public officials in charge), and investigation reports (the relative currency of the driver of the vehicle that has requested the repair of the vehicle at the time);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to accusation and control site photographs;

1. Article 79 of the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, Article 79 of the Automobile Management Act and Article 53 (1) of the same Act concerning the selection of punishment, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (when a sentence of suspension of execution is invalidated or revoked);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution is that the defendant repeatedly commits a crime of violating the Automobile Management Act, but the defendant's mistake is recognized, the crime of living is a living penalty and the defendant's economic situation is difficult, and this case's capture work is deemed to be a minor violation, and there is no profit for the defendant.