logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.07.15 2015가단3302
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) from April 23, 2012, with respect to Plaintiff A, KRW 18,861,920, KRW 23,183,00, and each of the above amounts.

Reasons

Basic Facts

A. The Plaintiffs and the Defendant entered into the following contracts (hereinafter “instant contracts”) on August 10, 2009, and received notarized regarding the said contracts on August 19, 2009.

Article 4 (Terms and Conditions of Contracts) (1) Eul (Plaintiff A) and Byung (Plaintiff B) shall provide support for the actual production costs related to Cator's film D.

(2) A (Defendant), B, and C shall have the following shares in respect of the overall profits related to D in connection with the Catoric film:

A: 50% of the total equity interest: 25% of the total equity interest: 25% of the total equity interest. ③ All matters related to A shall be undertaken by creating a separate business operator and shall operate in a transparent manner.

【Written Agreement to be Attached to D/Written Agreement】

(a) (Change in Matters of Equity Interest) In the formation of equity interests of Gap, Eul, and Byung under this Agreement, with respect to the change in the rate of equity in the event of the following:

(1) In supporting and supporting the production of documentary documentary motion pictureD, Eul and Byung shall provide assistance with the amount of 0 million won, which is at least 0 million won per month for three months after the commencement of a contract, and shall waive Eul and Byung's share at the time of non-performance.

(2) In raising D production costs, D and C are subject to changes in their shareholding ratio in accordance with the performance rate as follows (Provided, That the production costs are limited to the costs incurred in pure film production, and the detailed contents and scope of production costs are limited to the production costs, and the scope of the production costs is determined by mutual agreement).

On September 3, 2009, the plaintiffs and the defendant made a trade name business operator "E" under the contract of this case, and used the office of the plaintiff B's fishery partnershipF as the above business operator's office.

C. The film D, taken by the Defendant, was invited to make an open North Korean business system around April 2012, with the production of works.

arrow