1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 18,00,000 against the Plaintiff and its related thereto, from June 14, 2013 to December 4, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

1. According to the purport of Gap evidence No. 3 and Eul evidence No. 2 as to the cause of the claim and the whole arguments, the plaintiff loaned a total of KRW 5 million to the defendant around the end of July 201, and KRW 35 million on August 17, 2011, and the defendant remitted a total of KRW 1 million to the plaintiff on August 30, 201, and the plaintiff was liable to pay KRW 16 million among the above loans ( KRW 15 million on Nov. 25, 201, KRW 6 million on Nov. 28, 2011) to the plaintiff at the rate of KRW 18 million ( KRW 30 million on Nov. 28, 201, KRW 400 on the following day of the above loans to the plaintiff at the rate of KRW 5 million on August 30, 201, KRW 16 million on which the plaintiff was liable to pay the above loans at the rate of KRW 4 million on Nov. 28, 2011.

2. Judgment on the defendant's defense

A. As to the defense for repayment, the Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff remitted KRW 5 million to the Plaintiff on September 6, 201, and that the Defendant paid KRW 12 million to the Plaintiff on October 201, including the payment of KRW 6 million in cash. Thus, according to the evidence Nos. 2, the Defendant may acknowledge the fact that the Defendant remitted KRW 5 million to the Plaintiff on September 6, 201. However, according to the evidence No. 7, the above KRW 5 million was remitted to the Plaintiff on September 6, 201, and there is no other evidence to prove that the Defendant additionally repaid KRW 12 million to the Plaintiff.

Therefore, the defendant's defense is without merit.

B. As to the offset defense, the Defendant’s defense was leased by FF Co., Ltd. Nos. 101 and 102 of the Busan East-gu C building 101, but did not pay all the lease deposit and rent.

On the other hand, the defendant is above.