logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원군산지원 2020.12.16 2020고단1494
사기미수
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The financial fraud organization of telephone communications (hereinafter referred to as “scams”) is acquiring money from victims by means of telephone, etc., with a system composed of inducements to transfer money to victims, a total withdrawals that instruct withdrawals of transferred money, and a withdrawals that withdraw money from a financial institution’s cash payment machine or transfer money to a Boscaming organization by receiving money from victims.

On March 2020, when the Defendant informed the Defendant of the amount of money to be collected at the place and the amount to be collected by the bearers through the name and non-surg, the name and non-surgs (the “B team leader”) of the organization for the use of the Defendant’s job-seeking advertisement, the Defendant moved to the relevant place, received the money from the victims of the use of the surg, and conspired to receive the money from the non-surg to the account directed by the victims of the surg, and then,

On March 20, 2020, the name-freeist called the victim C by telephone and misrepresenting the staff of the D Bank, and falsely concluding that “A loan may be made up to 50 million won at low interest, but the existing loan shall be repaid. It shall be paid to the staff.”

However, in fact, the person who was not a member of the DNA bank was not a member of the DNA bank, and there was no intention or ability to lend the victim.

On March 24, 2020, the Defendant received the order from the above person under his name to prohibit him from receiving a bill of war with the telegram. At around 16:30 on the same day, the Defendant attempted to receive KRW 17 million in cash from the victim in front of Mapo-si, and was arrested as a flagrant offender, but did not bring about such intent, and did not commit an attempted crime.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the person who was not injured in name, intended to receive property from the victim, but attempted to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Examination of the accused's suspect's interrogation statement by prosecution;

1. C, .

arrow