1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the instant case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the court citing the judgment of the court of first instance citing the reasoning of the judgment or adding the judgment of the plaintiff's argument at the trial of the court of first instance citing it pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text

(Other matters alleged by the Plaintiff in the trial are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the Plaintiff in the first instance trial, and even if all of the evidence submitted in the first instance and the first instance trial are examined, the judgment of the first instance court that rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable). [The part to be dismissed] On the seven pages of the judgment of the first instance court, the “2-1” is dismissed as “2-2.”

The judgment of the court of first instance is 17 pages 21, 21, and 2, as “2-2.”

The 22th judgment of the first instance court, 19, 23th 5, and 8th 8th 19, respectively, shall be considered as an intervenor.

26 pages 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "director" shall be deemed to be "abrupty".

【Supplementary Decision】

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion, even if a disciplinary action on the instant dismissal is excessive and unreasonable, as long as the grounds for the disciplinary action are recognized, the Plaintiff should proceed with the procedure for re-Discipline against the Intervenor.

However, the retrial decision of this case is erroneous in recognizing procedural defects without procedural defects as to the dismissal disposition of this case. Thus, in order for the plaintiff to take appropriate disciplinary action, the retrial decision of this case to be effective against the plaintiff should be revoked.

B. According to Articles 9 and 10 of the Special Act on the Improvement of Status of 1 Teachers and the Development of Educational Activities, when a private school teacher is dissatisfied with a disciplinary action, an appeal review may be requested to the Appeal Commission for Teachers, and the decision of the Appeal Commission for Teachers shall bind the person in charge of the disposition, and the binding force shall affect not only the matters included in the text of the decision but also the recognition and judgment of the facts constituting

On the other hand, the private school personnel.