The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, as stated in the instant facts charged, found the Defendant guilty of the above facts charged, even though he did not have suffered residuals, etc. from the victim’s head, such as the victim’s head, was erroneous in the misapprehension of facts.

B. The lower court’s sentence against an unfair defendant in sentencing (an amount of KRW 700,00) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the grounds for appeal by the defendant

A. The following circumstances revealed through evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below regarding factual misunderstanding, namely, the victim was relatively consistent until the court below rendered a statement to the effect that "the injured party on the day of the instant case was able to fight on the side at the victim's request while driving the vehicle on behalf of the defendant and driving the vehicle on behalf of the defendant." The defendant, who gets the victim to undergo the victim's landings due to his fingers, while he gets the victim to undergo the victim's landings." At the time of the instant case, he stated that "the victim was subject to the victim's landings due to the victim's fingers." At the same time, the victim was able to receive the victim's remarks from the victim's fighting with the victim, and the victim was able to obtain the victim's remarks, etc. as stated in the instant charges by taking into account the following circumstances:

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

B. The Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime contingently, and the degree of assault does not seem to be significant.

However, on the other hand, the court below has already taken into account all favorable circumstances for the defendant as above.