A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 600,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Around 14:00 on April 15, 2014, the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out the fact that “the gue gue was frighted in a dynasium,” which read “the dynasium and dynasium caused by dynasical dynasium.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Witness D and E’s testimony [The defendant and his defense counsel are the defendant, his husband, victim, and person in the management room who had only been in the management room at the time did not have any possibility of spreading in relation to the victim or the defendant, and the apartment residents who had been in the management room did not have any possibility of spreading in relation to the victim or the defendant, so they are not in a situation where the defendant’s horses can be heard. However, according to the defendant’s argument, there is only four members in the management room, and even if the apartment residents could not hear the defendant’s horses, it is difficult to see that the defendant’s husband

1. Relevant Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the defendant does not recognize his/her mistake, taking into account the grounds for sentencing unfavorable to the defendant.

However, it is recognized that only the performance and the physical strength of the statement that is lower than the original criminal facts recognized in the summary order is recognized, and the defendant is the primary criminal reasons for sentencing favorable to the defendant.

In addition, the grounds for sentencing, such as the age and motive of the defendant, shall be determined as the same sentence as the order.