A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 05:50 on July 28, 2013, the Defendant, at the main point of “C” located in “C,” a Government-si, Ma, etc., deemed that the victim, while drinking alcohol together with the victim D(31 years of age), E, etc., was acting in a manner that the victim would be able to do so about the age, and when the victim was able to drink and shoot the victim’s face while fighting with the victim.

As a result, the defendant put the victim into the inner frame of the right side in need of treatment for about 42 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. A written statement;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of on-site photographs and Acts and subordinate statutes governing damaged parts;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the Probation and Social Service Order [Determination of Punishment] The general injury [the scope of recommendation and recommendation] general injury, the basic area of the body of injury [the suspension of execution of sentence], April through one year and six months] - Major illegal reasons: Criminal records of the same kind (not less than five years of suspension of execution): At least two general illegal reasons: criminal records of the same kind: criminal records of the suspension of execution at least twice: contingent crimes [the decision of sentence] for six months, the suspension of execution, two years, probation, community service, 40 hours: The defendant has a number of same and different criminal records; in particular, the defendant has been sentenced to a punishment of a fine for the suspension of execution of eight months as a result of the suspension of execution of imprisonment in 2010 for the crime of obstruction of performance of performance of duties in 2010; however, the crime in this case is committed at a disadvantage, such as the victim and unagreement, the fact that contingent crimes are committed, and the victim has paid approximately four million won for recovery of damage, etc.