Text
1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff 23,480,000 won and 20,000,000 won among them. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff full payment from December 9, 2016.
Reasons
1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3-1 and 2, and there is no counter-proof.
The Plaintiff paid KRW 5,00,000 on March 4, 2015, KRW 10,000 on March 12, 2015, KRW 10,000,00 on March 12, 2015, and KRW 20,000 on March 17, 2015, and KRW 20,000 on aggregate.
B. On April 20, 2016, the Defendant prepared and ordered the Plaintiff with the following loan certificates (hereinafter “the instant loan certificate”).
1) A creditor: (a) The amount of April 20, 2016 (20,000,000 won) on the date of re-lending: (b) April 20, 2016 (3), April 20, 2015): (c) the due date for reimbursement: (d) the 20th day of each month; (b) the interest on the installment of principal; (c) the interest on the 7th day of each month; (d) the interest on interest at 8.8% per annum; (d) the interest at 20% per annum; (e) the interest at 20% per annum; and (e) the interest at 8% per annum; and (e) the interest at 20% per annum; and (e) the creditor, even before the due date, shall pay without objection to a request for payment
9) Peculiars: The obligor borrowed 20,000,000 won from the obligee on April 3, 2015, but did not repay interest and principal (20,000,000 per year) on a one-year basis on a one-year basis, and did not repay interest and principal (20,000 per month interest, conditions for repayment of principal and interest, and 8.8% interest) accordingly, he/she re-preparations the re-extension on a similar condition.
C. The Defendant paid the Plaintiff the sum of KRW 50,00,00 on April 18, 2016, KRW 50,000 on April 19, 2016, KRW 50,000 on April 21, 2016, KRW 50,000 on April 22, 2016, KRW 50,00 on April 22, 2016, KRW 300,00 on April 27, 2016, KRW 50,00 on May 10, 2016, KRW 50,000 on May 19, 2016, KRW 50,000 on June 19, 2016, KRW 50,00 on June 1, 200, KRW 00 on June 25, 2016, KRW 00.
After receiving the above amount of KRW 20,000,000 from the Plaintiff, the Defendant sent several messages to the Plaintiff to the effect that the Plaintiff would repay the loan and interest to Kakao Stockholm.
2. Determination
A. The plaintiff's assertion 1 of the parties concerned gave a loan of KRW 20,000,00 to the defendant, and thus the defendant is the plaintiff.