logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.12.21 2017고단4334
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A live in the second floor of the operation of the building B at the same dubcheon, and the victim C(40) operated the real estate brokerage office on the first floor of the building B.

Around 15:40 on August 23, 2017, the Defendant and the victim had expressed a good appraisal due to a usual parking problem. Around 15:40 on August 23, 2017, at the parking lot of the above B building, the Defendant took one another’s bath while standing a dispute as a parking problem. The Defendant got the victim’s head by pushing the victim’s head toward the victim, and the victim was sleeped with the Defendant’s her slive and slick.

In addition, the Defendant prices the face of the victim in drinking, and inflicted injury on the victim, such as the 28th day of treatment, and the pelpel, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Copy of protocol concerning the examination of suspect C by the police; and

1. On-site photographs and photographs of suspects' faces;

1. Details of the report of the case

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing CCTV images CDs, written injury diagnosis;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The following facts are taken into account: (a) the degree of injury of the victim for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; (b) there is no agreement with the victim; (c) there are many kinds of violent crimes committed against the defendant; (d) there are circumstances unfavorable to the defendant; or (e) the defendant is in profoundly against the defendant; (e) there was no adequate appraisal due to the problem of usual parking with the victim; (e) the victim was injured; (e) the victim was injured; and (e) the defendant deposited KRW 3 million for the victim; and (e) the defendant deposited KRW 2 million for the victim after the closure of the pleadings.

arrow