A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

1. Obstruction of business;

A. On August 2, 2014, the Defendant, from around August 2, 2010 to around 23:50 of the same day, was dissatisfied with the victim G in the Helel operated by the victim G located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, the Defendant: (a) provided alcohol to the victim; and (b) found the victim; (c) provided alcohol to the victim; and (d) provided the victim with the complaint for the victim’s I Chairperson; and

Mah and J determined that the victim would die and throw away, and that the victim could not enter the said telecom by repeating the aforementioned verbal abuse when the victim released the Defendant out of the outside, thereby obstructing the victim from running the telecom business by force.

B. On August 13, 2014, the Defendant committed the crime from around 22:20 to 22:40 the same day from around August 13, 2014 to around 22:40 of the same day. The Defendant: (a) held at the place indicated in the above paragraph that “the Defendant would not open the her mouth to the above her body room; (b) the Defendant would be deemed as “the death of the inside her body,” and the Defendant would not open the her body room; and (c) caused the Defendant to interfere with the Defendant’s mother business by force by avoiding the disturbance, such as having the customers, who were try to take a lodging in the said her body room, and by having them go together with her fingers or walking.

(c)

around October 5, 2014, the Defendant committed the crime from around 22:20 to 22:50 the same day on October 5, 2014, to the victim G for the same reason at the place described in the foregoing paragraph (a). The Defendant: (b) whether the Victim G was “I”; (c)

In order to prevent customers from entering the Moel by avoiding disturbance, such as continuing to engage in abusive language and verbal abuse, the gue, which became disqualified, interfered with the victim’s Mour business by force.

(d)

From April 1, 2015 to April 22:2:20 of the crime committed on April 1, 2015, to 22:50 of the same day, the Defendant repeatedly opened the above telecom room on the ground that the victim G refuses the Defendant’s request for conversation at the place described in the foregoing paragraph (a). The Defendant repeatedly opened the phone in the above telecom room, and the victim is the Defendant.