logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.11.13 2013고정2978
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a tenant who operates a restaurant on the second floor of the building owned by the victim C(56,00) and is in a lease relationship.

피고인은 2013. 7. 5. 18:10경 용인 처인구 D에 있는 'E' 음식점 내에서 피해자가 식당 앞에 승용차를 주차해 놓고 빼주지 않는 다는 이유로 찾아가 "야 십할년아, 차 안빼냐"라고 하면서 주먹을 쥔 상태에서 손 바닥면 집게손가락 부분으로 공소사실에는 “주먹으로” 폭행한 것으로 되어 있으나, 증거에 의하여 인정되는 폭행의 태양과 일부 차이가 있고 이미 충분히 심리되어 피고인의 방어권행사에 실질적 불이익이 없으므로, 공소장변경 없이 판시와 같이 일부 수정하여 인정하였다.

The victim assaulted the victim's left face at one time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of F;

1. Application of each statute on the examination of witness C and G to each part of the examination protocol;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. At around 18:10 on July 5, 2013, the Defendant found the facts charged on the ground that the victim parked a passenger car in front of the restaurant in the “E” restaurant and did not cut off the passenger car in front of the restaurant, and caused injury to the victim on the part of the left side of the victim, taking into consideration on one occasion of the victim’s left face part of the restaurant, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

2. There is a victim’s statement, G’s statement, and injury diagnosis statement as evidence consistent with the above facts charged.

However, as seen below, each of the above evidence is difficult to believe as it is or is insufficient to consider it as evidence of guilt against the defendant, and the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is sufficient to recognize this part of the facts charged.

arrow