logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.10.24 2012가합20348
부당이득금
Text

1. Each of the plaintiffs' claims is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant comprehensively succeeded to the rights and obligations of the Korea Land Corporation and the Korea Housing Corporation established on October 1, 2009 under the Korea Land and Housing Corporation Act.

Under the Housing Construction Promotion Act on February 26, 2001, the Gyeonggi-do Governor approved a housing site creation project for Gyeonggi-do E and B (C district; hereinafter “instant project district”) pursuant to the Housing Construction Promotion Act, and on July 16, 2001, approved a housing site construction project plan to newly build 742 units of public rental housing in the instant project district (hereinafter “instant apartment site”) with 8 B block 29,259m2 in the instant project district on July 16, 2001.

(hereinafter referred to as "the apartment of this case" is the apartment constructed by the defendant with the above approval.

On April 20, 2002, the defendant first announced the apartment of this case to the following contents.

The sum of the construction costs of public residential housing sites for common use, 51.86.06, 15.0489 6.9.5927 (7.94) 76.5016 270 272,22424,691 43,69175,9175,915 239.56 23.56 m23.56 m2 for convenience, shall be marked as 23A-type apartment with an exclusive use area of 59.56 m23 m2 for convenience, with an apartment with an exclusive use area of 59.56 m23m2 for convenience.

17.283 76.843 11.0170 (9.1274) 87.8603 457.37,009 50,179 87,188 57.2862 76.8562 11.0188 (9.1289) 87.8750 157,015 50,187,202

C. After that, the plaintiffs except the plaintiff D and E (hereinafter "the priority buyers of this case") entered into a lease agreement with the defendant, and reside in the apartment of this case for five years, which is a mandatory rental period after the completion of the apartment of this case on May 19, 2004, and upon the arrival of the conversion period on July 2009, "each apartment of this case mentioned in the attached Table 2 "Dong and Dong" column among the apartment of this case as to each apartment of this case.

arrow