1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of disposition;

A. On January 2, 2008, the Plaintiff, who was employed as a street cleaners of the Mandong-gun Office of Mandong-gun on December 9, 2014, was diagnosed by the Mandong-mae-mae-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-

B. On March 31, 2015, the Defendant rejected the Plaintiff on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation between environmental aesthetic work and the injury and disease in the instant case.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). C.

The plaintiff was dissatisfied with the request for examination, but it was dismissed, and the request for reexamination was rejected on August 13, 2015.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1-2, Gap evidence 2-1, and 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff had been employed as a street cleaners and carried out garbage removal work and distance cleaning work for more than 40 hours a week more than 61 hours a week. From January 3, 2008 to 2012, the Plaintiff carried out a large number of work to knee in the instant wound by getting on and going on a vehicle transporting garbage and repeating her actions. There was no occurrence of the instant wound before entering the same, but from August 201, the Plaintiff started to receive treatment for knee-cne-cule infection. From January 2013, the Plaintiff started to take care of waste removal work by using the hydrogen in the alleyway where it is difficult for the cleaning vehicle to access, such as modane, heavy furniture, etc., and recyclable garbage from the day on which it is difficult for the cleaning vehicle to enter the road, and knee-knee-knee-knee-knee-knee-kne-kne-knee-kne-knee-kne-kneing work.