logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2013.07.26 2012나6534
부당이득금반환
Text

1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "B does not request the return of unjust enrichment of this case to Defendant C and the Intervenor joining the court in the lawsuit No. 2008Gadan8268, which was filed against Defendant C and the Intervenor joining the lawsuit No. 2008, which was filed against Defendant C, along with the name of the building at the time of the lawsuit No. 8268," and "B did not request the return of unjust enrichment of this case from the court of final appeal (Supreme Court Decision 201Da12996) as seen earlier, since two months have not elapsed since it was sentenced to the court of final appeal (Supreme Court Decision 201Da1296) and two months have not passed since the building of this case was ordered to the Plaintiff at the time of the conciliation of this case, it appears to have been ordered to use the building of this case by Defendant C and the Intervenor at the time of the conciliation of this case, and it appears to have not been related to the purpose of the conciliation and conciliation of this case between the Plaintiff C and the Defendant No. 4 of this case.

2. As such, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the principal lawsuit is legitimate, and all appeals against the principal lawsuit of this case are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow