1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff’s status is a corporation that intends to engage in waste treatment business in the area of 9,890 square meters of H-gun’s land for a factory in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do (hereinafter “instant project site”).

B. The Plaintiff’s amendment to the Plaintiff’s waste disposal business plan and its implementation process 1) around January 2007 to the head of the original regional environmental office, and submitted a business plan for the interim waste disposal business with a daily waste disposal capacity of 72 tons (designated waste 30%, non-designated waste 70%). Around July 2007, the Plaintiff submitted a business plan for the interim waste disposal business with a daily waste disposal capacity of 96 tons (designated waste 8 tons, designated non-designated waste 8 tons), and received an appropriate notification from the head of the original regional environmental office on October 1, 2007.2) on September 6, 201, the Plaintiff filed an application for permission to construct a new waste disposal facility with a total floor area of 1,474 square meters (designated waste 8 tons, designated non-designated waste disposal facility) (hereinafter “the Plaintiff’s construction permission to construct a new waste disposal facility”).

() Although the Defendant rejected the Plaintiff’s application for construction permission as of November 15, 2010, the Plaintiff filed an administrative litigation against the Defendant on January 17, 201, seeking the revocation of the said provisional construction permission. In the relevant administrative litigation, the judgment of revoking the said provisional construction permission was rendered on August 25, 2011, which was Daejeon High Court (Cheongju District Court) 201Nu564 on May 10, 201, and the judgment of dismissing the appeal was rendered on September 10, 2012 by the Supreme Court Decision 201Du1243 on September 13, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive. Meanwhile, the Defendant granted a construction permission to the Plaintiff in accordance with the purport of the said final judgment.