logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2019.01.10 2017가단125281
위임금반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Under the Plaintiff’s name, the registration of ownership transfer was completed with respect to each real estate indicated in the “real estate indication” column below (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”).

On August 23, 2007, the registration date of the real estate indicated as the date of the registration is the cause for the registration of the real estate, and the sale on August 20, 2007 D, Gyeonggi-gun, Gyeonggi-do on August 20, 2007, the purchase and sale on April 30, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as the "EFL") was made in the name of the I on August 15, 2008, the registration date was sold at KRW 93 million to I on February 20, 208, and the registration date was made in the name of the I on April 15, 2008.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 6's evidence (including attachment of provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul 3 and 5's evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Defendants asserted as the cause of the claim do not arbitrarily consume and return the Plaintiff’s money of 156,00,000,000 as indicated in the table below (hereinafter “instant table”). As such, the Defendants are obliged to pay the said money and damages for delay.

On February 18, 2009, 200, 200,000 won, 12,000 won from the remainder of 1.29,00,000 won of the guaranteed loan to the Defendants’ Plaintiff on August 25, 2009, 200, 1200,000 won, i.e., the Plaintiff’s J insurance termination money, etc., but i., the Defendants’ J insurance termination money, etc. was not returned. However, on August 20, 207, 200, 200, 200,000 won was not returned to the Defendants on June 12, 2009, 300, 200 won was not returned to the Defendants.

B. In full view of the following circumstances, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone, which can be acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of each of the evidence Nos. 1 through 7, the Defendant’s money owned by the Plaintiff.

arrow