(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.11 2015나17462

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.11 2015나17462

물품판매대금

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. In full view of the facts of the basis and the Plaintiff’s assertion Nos. 1, 7, and 11 and the purport of the entire pleadings by the Defendant’s first instance court, the Plaintiff is a person operating the clothing store “C” (hereinafter “instant store”) and “D” by importing and selling clothing produced in China while staying in China. The Defendant is recognized to have worked as an employee from May 13, 2013 to July 18, 2013 at the instant store.

The plaintiff asserts as follows.

During the Defendant’s working period, 8,373, 107, 77, 772, 1,155, 6,53 (107 - 107 - 1,155), 6,553 (107 - 107 - 1055) should be included in the Defendant’s garment inventory at the time of the Defendant’s retirement, on the grounds that 6,553 (107 - 107 - 1,155) should be included in the clothing that the Plaintiff imported from China and sent to the instant store.

However, at the time of the defendant's retirement, the inventory quantity of the clothes is 5,567, and 986 (6,553 – 5,567) is the mother and the defendant embezzled ( deducted). Thus, the defendant is liable to pay 10,405,00 won, which is the value of the clothes 986, as compensation for damages caused by a tort, to the plaintiff.

2. The evidence No. 2, which seems to correspond to the fact that the clothes, which the plaintiff imported from China and sent to the store of this case, were 8,373, was prepared on the basis of the evidence No. 10 prepared by the plaintiff, and some content No. 5.12, 12;

5.22.Woman;

5. The number of clothes sent as of 27.27 is different from the statement of Gap evidence No. 10, and it is difficult to believe its contents. Gap evidence Nos. 7 and 11 merely stated the quantity or weight of the garrative package of the garrative unit of the garrative unit of the garrative unit of the garrative unit of China, and it is not about the quantity of the garrative unit of the garrative unit of the garrative unit of the garrative unit of the garrative unit of the No. 7,708 (8,373 - 107 - 772), or the quantity of the garrative unit of the defendant

유사 판례

-서울서부지방법원 2015.03.27 2014나4112

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.06.21 2018나62296

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.30 2014고단9764

-수원지방법원안양지원 2017.10.12 2016가합102349

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.13 2015가단5001515