Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who served as a medical doctor in the Flag care hospital located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si from May 13, 2015 to January 10, 2016.

Each medical person shall keep the records of medical treatment, assistance in child delivery, nursing records, and other records concerning medical treatment, and shall record the matters and opinions concerning medical treatment, such as the main symptoms, diagnosis and treatment of the patient, in detail and sign thereon.

Nevertheless, around 12:04 on July 11, 2015, the Defendant: (a) prescribed oriental medicine in the F Care Hospital at the above F Care Center; (b) did not enter the details of the overlapping in the treatment record book; and (c) did not enter the matters concerning the Defendant’s medical practice in the medical record book over 10 times from around that time to September 14, 2015, or did not sign the record.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each testimony of witness G, H and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to part of a patient treatment register (which is not made by the defendant himself/herself, but recorded electronically);

1. Article 90 and Article 22 (1) of the Medical Service Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The sequence 1 of crime inundations;

A. The police investigation, prosecutorial investigation, and prosecutorial investigation regarding each of the facts charged by the defendant alleged to be charged are different.

The judgment on the final lawsuit in the court of this case shall be stated.

(hereinafter the same shall apply)

The record was not recorded because G had been returned to manufacture approximately KRW 200,000,000 of the discontinued protection.

B. Determination: G was not returned to G when a bridge was prepared after being treated by Ampha Defendant and received treatment from Ampha Defendant.

was testified.

The defendant prepares any kind of herb drugs, regardless of them.