logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.03.19 2013고정2957
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing taxi.

On June 23, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 07:30 on June 23, 2013, and driven the above vehicle at a speed of about 20 km in the speed of Si/Gun/Gu in the direction of Si/Gun/Gu in the direction of Si/Gun/Gu, depending on the four-lane road in front of the restaurant of the “Mandong-dong, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, Seoul.”

On the other hand, it is confirmed whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a crosswalk on which a signal signal, etc. has been installed, and therefore, whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has dried the crosswalk by reducing the speed of the motor vehicle and checking well the front door. On the other hand, when a pedestrian is traveling along the crosswalk, even though he/she has a duty of care to temporarily stop in front of the crosswalk so as not to obstruct or endangering the passage of the pedestrian, so he/she was negligent in doing so, and the defendant did not find the victim C (ma, 74 years old) who walks the crosswalk toward the left side of the direction according to the signal of the he/she is moving along the crosswalk, and did so in excess of the floor by shocking the left side of the motor vehicle of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as “one-time fresh fresh fresh and fresh fresh fresh fresh,” which requires approximately six weeks of medical treatment by occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. A medical certificate;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes stating the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to Relevant Acts concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or more;

arrow