logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.12.17 2015재고단24
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The seized evidence No. 10 shall be returned to the victim's name unrefilled person.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 27, 2006, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for larceny at the Busan District Court. On December 24, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor at the Busan District Court for larceny, etc. on December 24, 2008, and on July 23, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Ulsan District Court for larceny, which became final and conclusive on December 17, 2010, and the said suspension of the execution of the said sentence was terminated on July 31, 201.

Around 12:20 on March 16, 2012, the Defendant: (a) opened a door-to-faceless driver’s seat of the victim E parked on the front road located in the Dong-gu Busan Metropolitan City (hereinafter “D”); (b) and (c) took documents equivalent to KRW 270,000 in the market price of the victim’s possession of the above Poter, and habitually stolen the total amount of KRW 30,000 in cash, including one digital camera with the market price of KRW 240,000 in total, and KRW 1,195,000 in total, from that time on April 25, 2012 to October 17, 2010, the Defendant habitually stolen the entire market price of KRW 270,000 in the same way as indicated in the list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and G;

1. Each statement of H, I, J, K, L, M, N,O, and P;

1. An investigation report (to hear victim Q, R telephone statements, and to verify damaged vehicle numbers, etc.);

1. Seized evidence subparagraphs 1 through 14;

1. Before judgment: Criminal records and investigation reports (report on the results of confirmation before disposition and report on the date of release);

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the frequency of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the repeated crimes of the same kind in the judgment;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Articles 332 and 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (or, collectively, the choice of imprisonment);

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. Article 333 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for return;

arrow