A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

From May 1, 2012, the Defendant is a public duty personnel in charge of social welfare-related duties under the jurisdiction of the Dong-dong Office, and various administrative assistance in the same room under the jurisdiction of the Si/Gu from May 27, 2013 to the Si/Gu from May 27, 2013.

On May 27, 2013, the Defendant was absent from work without permission from F, etc. as a supervisor for service, and was absent from work without any justifiable reason in each of the same offices on May 28, 2013, May 29, 2013, May 29, 2013, May 30, 2013, May 31, 2013, and May 31, 2013, and June 3, 2013.

As such, the Defendant left his service for eight days in total without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning the F;

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of three copies of a fact-finding report on a breach of service, one copy of a report on a breach of service, two copies of a fact-finding report on a breach of service, and one copy of a report on a breach of service duty;

1. A favorable condition for sentencing under Article 89-2 subparag. 1 of the Act on the Violation of the relevant Act on Criminal Crimes, such as the fact that a defendant recognized and reflects a crime, the fact that he/she has no criminal record of imprisonment or any heavier punishment, and the defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for the same crime and two years of suspended execution in the Seocho District Court’s early branch on May 1, 2013, and was sentenced to two years of suspended execution on May 9, 2013, which became final and conclusive and conclusive on May 9, 2013, which is disadvantageous to the defendant, such as the fact that he/she