logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.07.10 2015가단7483
건물명도
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. From March 5, 2015, the above real estate.

Reasons

While the Plaintiff leased the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) to the Defendant from around December 28, 2007, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) by changing the lease deposit to December 28, 2012 from December 28, 2012 to December 27, 2014 (hereinafter “the instant lease agreement”). The Defendant continued to occupy and use the instant real estate after the expiration of the period without the renewal of the instant lease agreement; the remainder after the Plaintiff deducted the lease deposit against the Defendant, the Defendant filed an application for a payment order (Seoul Western District Court Decision 2014Hu72871, Jul. 28, 2015) with the Defendant seeking payment of KRW 23,076,00,00, which became final and conclusive pursuant to Article 15(1) of the Civil Procedure Act.

According to the above facts, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff and pay the Plaintiff the amount equivalent to KRW 1,700,000 for monthly rent from March 5, 2015 to the completion date of delivery of the instant real estate, as sought by the Plaintiff, as a result of the termination date of the instant lease agreement.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is decided as per Disposition by admitting it.

arrow