A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 21, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 21:30 on September 21, 2012, at the event site located in Seopoposi C, the Defendant: (b) placed two parts of the “D flashing flaf,” instead of string through a string box; (c) flafing the flaf into the flaf; and (d) flafing the flaf with a large interest of the victim; and (d) flafing the flaf with the victim, flafing the flaf; (b) flafing the flaf with the victim’s 180·C flaf with oil flaf with the victim’s body, and flafed with the victim’s 2-2 and flaf with the victim’s hand, excluding the flaf’s flaf’s flaf with the victim’s body.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Application of statutes to copies of each written diagnosis;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act, which is confession and reflects in depth

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion regarding the defendant under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act and the defense counsel asserted that the defendant was guilty of having lost self-defense while under the influence of alcohol and committed each of the crimes of this case. Thus, according to the records, the defendant's drinking at the time of each of the crimes of this case is deemed to have been in a state of mental disorder under the influence of alcohol, but it does not seem that the defendant had weak ability to discern things or make decisions. Thus, the above assertion is not appropriate.