A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On October 1, 2019, at around 11:00, the Defendant requested the victim to purchase the above house on the ground that there was a problem in the sewage treatment equipment of the house purchased by brokerage from the victim for about four years in the D real estate office operated by the victim C, which was operated by the victim C in Gohap-gun, Namcheon-gun, around 00, but the victim refused to purchase the house, and thereby the victim refused to purchase the house, “I would like to purchase the house at the same time. I would not hear the horses,” and by preventing the customer from entering the office by force, the Defendant interfered with the business of the real estate brokerage office of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police statement of the defendant in relation to the defendant's partial statement C, report on internal investigation (in-house investigation), report on internal investigation (in relation to attachment of field photographs), and report on internal investigation (in relation to attachment of the 112 Report List

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order of this case, following the prosecution of this case, the defendant requested the victim to purchase the above house on the ground that there was a problem in the sewage system of the house purchased by brokerage from the victim C (53 years old) at the time and place of criminal facts, such as the defendant's refusal of the punishment of the defendant by agreement with the victim after the prosecution of this case, the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, the defendant lives together with his wife with his wife who has a intellectual disability, and the defendant's wife wanting to leave his wife against the defendant, etc.

2. The facts charged in this part of the judgment are the crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the express will of the victim under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

However, the victim is the victim.