A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2015. 11. 13. 09:30 경 서울 동작구 장승 배기로 161에 있는 ‘ 동작 구청 교통종합 민원실’ 안에서, 동작 구청 교통지도 과로부터 피고인 소유의 B 엑센트 승용차가 여러 차례 주차위반 단속을 당하자 민원을 제기하였음에도 받아 주지 않는다는 이유로 화가 나, 미리 경유 8ℓ 가 든 플라스틱 통을 준비하여 들고 교통종합 민원실 안으로 들어가 피고인의 몸 위에 경유를 붇고, 그 곳으로 찾아온 동작 구청 소속 공무원인 C에게 경유를 뿌린 후 한 손에 일회용 가스 라이터를 들고 “ 같이 죽자. ”라고 소리를 지르며 협박하였다.

In this respect, the Defendant, by carrying with himself a dangerous object, has interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. Seizure records;

1. Notification of departments related to the report of 112 cases, a detailed statement of the purchase card of light oil, a receipt to purchase light oil, and an investigation report (related to seals seized upon voluntary submission);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs and seized articles;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 144(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (the point of obstructing the performance of special public services and the choice of imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds of sentencing as follows);

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection, etc. of Social Service Orders;

1. In this case’s reasoning for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act, the Defendant, during the business hours, putting inflammable substances into the Gu’s civil petition office while putting them in the body and putting them into danger to the life and body of the people in his/her and their surroundings, thereby threatening the public officials of the Gu’s office. Accordingly, not only the counter public officials, but also the surrounding civil petitioners, and the Defendant’s unexpected fear of imminent fear.