A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. From November 23, 2016, around 05:30 on November 23, 2016, the Defendant: (a) brought up a stitius in which the victim D (e.g., older than 74) who is a store operator was fluor in a string room of the first basement in Seoul Gwangjin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City; (b) the sum of the market prices in which the victim owned the other victim, is 18,200 won, in total; (c) one shamper, one shamper, one shamper, one shamper, one shamper, one fluor, and one wre.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

2. On November 23, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was entering a bath with a stolen disposable product, as described in the foregoing paragraph 1, around 07:30 on November 23, 2016; and (b) from the victim E (V) of the bathing bath that discovered it, the Defendant “this product has been anywhere.”

In addition, “I must enter a bath after the shower box,” sees the horse, “I will interfere with the business by fing it on the Internet because I would interfere with the business,” sees that I would act as if I would f of staff member F who f who reads it and show the suspect, and she would be able to hack the victim’s body with the victim’s hack with the victim’s hack with the victim’s hack with the victim’s body to show the suspect, and she would cause the victim to face the victim’s hack with the victim’s hack with the victim’s hacke of eight times in the number of treatment days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles and E-damage photographs;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of intention) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the observation of protection and observation are disadvantageous to the fact that the defendant has not been agreed with the victims, and the defendant's primary offender, the defendant's depression, and the disease with polar disorder has an impact on the crime of this case.