beta
Text
1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The defendant is an organization whose members include a church where the trader who was admitted to the zone in the state of official residence works, a Ciplomatic Association and an affiliated organization of this religious order located in the area of official residence, and the plaintiff is a person who served as a member of the "Diplomatic Association" (hereinafter "instant church") who was a member of the defendant.
B. On October 6, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against the charge of violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Indecent Act on the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes) that “the head of the E Center, as the head of the E Center, was investigated on the grounds that there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge the suspected crime from the official branch office of the Daejeon District Public Prosecutor’s Office of Daejeon District Public Prosecutor’s Office on March 4, 2015, the Plaintiff committed an indecent act on the ground that there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge the suspected crime by the official branch office of the Daejeon District Public Prosecutor’s Office.
C. On November 16, 2015, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of a request to attend the Investigation Committee to the effect that “A will attend the Investigation Committee and give an explanation to an inquiry, and if an applicant fails to attend without any justifiable reason, it shall be deemed to recognize all the facts investigated by the Investigation Committee.” The Defendant presented an agenda “A disciplinary case” at an extraordinary general meeting held on July 21, 2016 at the extraordinary general meeting held on July 21, 2016 and thereby lost the qualification for membership until December 2016, and made a resolution (hereinafter “the first resolution”).
The Defendant’s decision on the “case of disciplinary action against A” at an ordinary meeting held on December 15, 2016 is dismissed on the ground that the Defendant failed to pay membership fees for at least one year based on Article 21(1) of the Defendant’s Code (Article 21(2).
"Contents..."