1. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant that was changed in exchange at the trial is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff and the defendant.

A. A written agreement to pay an amount of 1% per month was written, and the defendant marks the above written agreement as a observer.

2) The above agreement shall contain the following statement of accounts (hereinafter “instant statement of accounts”).

- Defendant 2: 861,809,600 - 307 - 704 - 704 - 708 - 9 - 3000,000 - 274 - 9 - 307 - 9 - 207 - 300,000 - 9 - 704 - 708 -6 - 307 -4 -6300,000 - 9 - 207 -4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 - 9 - 704 -6 -6 ,000 74,000 ,000 ,07 ,000 ,000 ,000 - 308 -6300,000 -630,000

E. C’s revocation of a disposition to reduce the number of automobiles (1) on February 20, 2008, and C’s revocation order to reduce the number of automobiles for business use (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that C’s operation of a taxi for business use violates Article 12 of the Passenger Transport Service Act by having H and I without a certificate of taxi driving qualification from the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor on February 20, 2008.

(2) On October 17, 2008, C filed a lawsuit against the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor seeking the revocation of the instant disposition (Seoul Administrative Court 2008Guhap41359), and