Defendant

B Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Criminal facts

1. From November 1, 2019, the Defendants corrected “from November 3, 2019 to “from November 1, 2019” among the facts charged, the Defendants recognized the criminal facts by correcting “from November 1, 2019.”

From February 24, 2020 to the first floor of the building located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the studio 6 and the studio 7-170,000 won are installed and operated in the name of “D.” Defendant B, as the owner of the business, managed the business by leasing the above business to the Internet “E”, “F”, etc. Under the direction of Defendant B, Defendant A, as the head of the office, directed foreign female workers of the motherland nationality who are waiting for the above business place to contact with the many unspecified male customers and received monthly pay. Defendant A, as the head of the office, provided that Defendant A, as the head of the office, provided guidance to female workers of the motherland nationality who are waiting for the above business place and received 6-17,000,000 won for each course of sexual traffic and had the above female customers to have sexual intercourse with the above male customers.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to commit acts such as arranging sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. Although Defendant B’s violation of the Immigration Control Act was prohibited from employing a foreigner who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment in the Republic of Korea, Defendant B, as described in paragraph (1), paid a certain amount of allowance to the above G, etc. of the mother country’s nationality that did not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment in the said “D” sexual traffic business establishment from November 3, 2019 to February 24, 2020, and employed the said business establishment as an employee to engage in sexual traffic business as above.

As a result, Defendant B employed foreigners who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment in Korea.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. G, H, and I.