(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.08.25 2017고합219

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.08.25 2017고합219

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 2, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to six years of imprisonment with prison labor for robbery as a crime of robbery in the Seo-gu District Court Branch of the Daegu District Court on December 2, 2010, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Ansan Prison on September 18, 2016.

On May 7, 2017, at around 201:30, the Defendant threatened the victim E (V, 56 years of age) who was the victim of the instant multi-facelive phone (F) with the Defendant’s cell phone and reported the Defendant to the police by interference with his/her duties, on the ground that he/she reported the Defendant to the police by the crime of interference with his/her duties, at around two months prior to May 7, 2017, at the same time, the Defendant: (a) threatened the victim by phone (F) on the said multi-facel phone; (b) promptly posing the said multi-facel; (c) told the victim; and (d) immediately citing the victim by citing the victim’s free Cup owned by the victim of approximately KRW 2,000 at the market price on the table; (b) threatened the victim with the purpose of the proviso to investigation and statement in relation to his/her criminal case; and (c) damaged property owned by the victim.

On March 17, 2017, from around 14:10 to 15:40 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) applied for a subsidy to the Dong Office; (b) opened a hand-on telephone and glass cup, which was held by the person in charge of the Dong Office on the ground that he did not receive a telephone; and (c) opened a hand-on telephone and glass cup on the table; and (d) interfered with the victim’s multi-face-on business by force by force, such as “the telephone of the spilee and the spacker,” and “the spacker” in a large sound voice.

Summary of Evidence

" 2017 Gohap 219"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. On-site photographs "2017 Gohap 233";

1. Statement of the defendant in the first trial protocol in the Daegu District Court 2017 High Court Order 1496

1. The protocol of interrogation of suspects of E by the police;

1. References to inquiries, such as criminal history, and application of identification-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Criminal facts;

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.07.13 2017고합35

-창원지방법원 통영지원 2017.11.16 2017고합74

-대구지방법원 2017.12.22 2017고합327

-서울남부지방법원 2018.05.04 2017고합494

-수원지방법원 2017.11.02 2016고합770